Need business intelligence on sustainability issues? Big data analytics have solutions to guide your strategy.
In the late 17th century, Sir Henry Furnese was known for his network of correspondents that delivered information from across Europe. Furnese and his informants are featured in what is probably the first mention of the term business intelligence. As wars shifted the fates of countries and rulers, Furnese’s lock on early information about Europe’s political tribulations helped him become a prominent London banker.
Today, business intelligence remains vital. The term refers to the transformation of data into knowledge that can support business decisions. As Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues become central to business strategy, companies require new types of non-financial business intelligence. Big data analytics offer intriguing solutions that can guide companies’ sustainability strategies.
How Data Analytics Can Shape Strategy
Data on ESG issues come from many sources: news, government regulations, rankings and awards, social media, and companies’ own reports. This information is hard to track – it’s abundant, it changes quickly, and it comes in many formats.
Emerging data analytic technologies can address this challenge. Already, services can identify ESG issues that are material to companies, flag risks, benchmark a company’s sustainability reporting against competitors, monitor media references to strategic issues, and analyze sustainability best practices.
Data analytic approaches to business intelligence also have pitfalls. Data may be unreliable, or can distract companies from answering questions that are more important but harder to answer. Companies are developing different ways to grapple with such challenges.
Case 1: Materiality Assessment
Companies need to identify the most relevant issues for their sustainability strategy. They often approach this task with a methodical process of materiality assessment. Traditionally, company staff or consultants talk with and survey key stakeholders, such as board members, executives, customers, investors, and NGOs. The company learns what importance stakeholders attach to items on a pre-defined list of ESG issues.
Such traditional materiality assessment also builds stakeholder relationships. But it can only be done occasionally, since it’s expensive and time consuming. Resource constraints also mean that the process can only target a limited number of issues and stakeholders. The company needs to identify key stakeholders and issues in advance, and the assessment’s value depends on getting those picks right.
A Data-Analytic Alternative
Datamaran, a business intelligence platform, takes a different approach to materiality assessment. Without interacting directly with stakeholders, the platform reviews multiple sources that provide proxies for their views. The system analyzes how these sources address ESG issues and produces tailored reports for clients. Compared with the traditional approach, such an analysis is more comprehensive and can be done on an ongoing basis.
The platform analyzes a variety of written resources using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques that allow computers to interpret human language. “Essentially,” says Donato Calace, director of Innovation at Datamaran, “we teach computers how to read.”
The company has databases of corporate reports, regulatory initiatives, and online news sources, which it continuously updates and monitors. It also tracks social media conversations. Datamaran’s engine searches these sources for content relevant to 100 different ESG topics, using a dictionary with over 6,000 key terms. The system tracks the amount of space dedicated to each of these topics, as well as the context in which they are mentioned.
Datamaran’s materiality assessments cover concerns in each market and industry; issues faced by competitors, supply-chain partners, and stakeholders; changes in the regulatory environment; and sentiment in the news and social media. The resulting analysis is more comprehensive than a traditional one and can also be continually updated.
Datamaran considers this tool as complementary to traditional materiality assessment. “We don’t say that our approach should replace direct stakeholders engagement,” says Calace, “because stakeholder engagement is very important. It allows you to stay in touch with the community of stakeholders that are very close to you. But what if you can complement your engagement with a big universe of data? Thousands of reports, thousands of tweets, thousands of news articles? What happens when you analyze all this data and you crunch it? This is the perspective we’re presenting to companies.”
The topics identified by the system can catch clients by surprise. Calace recalls a materiality assessment conducted for a bank, which pointed to financial education as an emerging trend. Initially, bank staff were reluctant to accept the results. They asked, “‘How is it possible? Why is financial education so big in social media,’” Calace recalls. The analysts showed the evidence: “You provide them with the amount of tweets that you found, with the frequency of tweets, and you show them that actually this is justified.”
Case 2: Social Media Monitoring
Shortly after Liberty McKee opened her Howell, Michigan hair salon, 85 comments appeared within minutes on the new business’s Facebook page, accusing her of murdering her grandparents for life insurance money. These posts were part of a campaign of false claims that also accused the business of ISIS ties. The posts strained relationships with customers, employees and community members.
Stakeholder relationships are at the heart of sustainability strategy, and such relationships can be deeply hurt by false social media posts that sometimes go viral within hours. Attēgo offers a data-analytic solution.
The company has developed altumINSIGHT, a tool that monitors social media conversations related to company operations, provides early alerts on emerging risks, and identifies ways to shape social network narratives.
altumINSIGHT tracks the content of social media conversations and analyzes the structure of the communications network. The tool identifies stakeholders and monitors their level of trust toward the company. Based on social network analysis, the system identifies each stakeholder’s conversational role and degree of influence within the network, allowing the company to connect to the most influential communicators.
Case 3: Risk Assessment
RepRisk addresses a related problem: sustainability risks that companies face due to their relationships with other organizations, such as suppliers or collaborators. A company can become associated with questionable ESG practices and be held accountable for them: for example, as when white supremacist protests used Tiki Torches recently.
RepRisk’s ESG Risk Platform provides risk monitoring, using a database with risk data about over 100,000 organizations globally. Daily, the platform screens over 80,000 media and stakeholder sources in 15 languages, tracking whether companies might be linked to issues such as local pollution, human rights abuses, or child labor. Clients can use RepRisk reports for due diligence on new business partners or to monitor existing partners.
“Fake” Data: The Problem of Reliability
So much information is available — but how trustworthy is it? With the digital space so vulnerable to fake news and social media communications, it’s impossible to take digital content at face value.
Marc Epstein, professor at Rice University, urges analysts to consider the credibility of any type of content, including sustainability reports. “If you’re using sustainability reports,” says Epstein, “you have to understand how those are prepared. Sustainability reports are prepared by either the external relations department or an outside public relations firm. They tell a story. But this is not necessarily a reliable data point. This is the company reporting what they want to report in terms of their sustainability performance. But I would not want to use that to come up with any conclusions at all about what the universe looks like.“
Data analytic solutions take various approaches to the problem of reliability. Datamaran triangulates data across sources to gain objectivity. Yet, the platform does not take a position on the factual truth of the content it analyzes. Its focus is not on assessing actual sustainability performance, but whether or not a topic is addressed. If an issue receives attention in media and reports, or if a company is seen in a certain way, this perception in itself is valuable information that should be considered in sustainability strategy.
RepRisk deals with the uncertain reliability of corporate reports by ignoring them altogether and instead focusing on data that come from external sources, such as media, stakeholders and third-party evaluators. Still, an automated analysis is only as good as the sources it processes.
A Place for Humans
Fortunately, human experts can aid in evaluating the reliability of business intelligence. After RepRisk’s system performs an initial computerized screening, it delivers the results to analysts, who complete the process, safeguarding data integrity and analysis quality.
At Attego, social scientific research complements data analytics. Attego is affiliated with RTI International, a large research institute. RTI’s research capabilities let Attēgo investigate the truth of social media claims and collect data to refute false claims. Skilled analysts are important for refining data into intelligence, says Jason Norman, Attēgo’s managing director. They can “lay over the contextual understanding from the private sector issues that we’re looking to address.”
The Way Forward for ESG Business Intelligence
As companies seek new ways to integrate sustainability into their strategy and business models, data-driven solutions are evolving to meet those needs. Ioannis Ioannou, professor at London Business School, believes that new data technologies will come to assume a central role in sustainability strategy.
“We know that what gets measured, gets managed,” says Ioannou. “So, this kind of technologies will allow companies to measure and manage their impact not only on their shareholders, but on the diversity of stakeholders with which they interact.”
Sustainability isn’t going away, says Ioannou. Instead, it’s becoming more complex, and data analytics can give companies the business intelligence they need. “I think that these issues are becoming more and more core to strategy. They are not peripheral to strategy. They’re not an add-on. I do not think this is going to be a nice technology to have, but it’s going to be a necessary technology, especially for those companies that are really genuine and serious about their commitment towards stakeholders and towards having a positive impact on society. In other words, sustainable companies.”
About the Author
Tal Yifat is a data scientist who specializes in business sustainability. He has a PhD in organizational sociology from the University of Chicago.
About this Series
Artificial Intelligence, fintech, Internet of Things — businesses today face an environment of continuous disruption. These trends can distract managers from sustainability — but they can also support a company’s sustainability efforts.
In the New Data Technologies for Sustainability series, NBS offers guidance on aligning your company’s sustainability initiatives with the transition to big data and related technologies.
Add a Comment
This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.