Collaboration for Innovation: Transforming the Oil Sands Together

Collaboration for Innovation: Transforming the Oil Sands Together

Canada’s oil sands companies are collaborating to improve environmental impact. Gordon Lambert (Suncor) describes how a competitive industry came together.
Gordon Lambert December 9, 2013
Canada’s oil sands companies are collaborating to improve environmental performance. In this Thought Leadership post, Gordon Lambert of Suncor Energy describes their experience and the implications for other sectors interested in collaboration. 

We know new models to address environment and social challenges are needed, and collaboration is widely hailed as such a promising model. One of the boldest examples of business collaboration for sustainability is emerging in the Canadian oil sands and is known as Canada's Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA).

Canada’s oil sands are a vital resource: the world’s third largest proven reserve of oil. But they’ve been criticized on environmental and social grounds. As an initiator of COSIA, I offer a report on what we’ve learned about addressing our environmental challenges collaboratively.

Deciding We Needed to Work Together

COSIA grew out of two smaller-scale pilots, the Oil Sands Leadership Initiative (OSLI) and the Oil Sands Tailings Consortium (OSTC). OSLI brought six companies together to accelerate environmental improvement; OSTC involved eight oil sands mining companies who agreed to share tailings technologies.

OSLI and OSTC created insights, lessons and ambition. However, they weren’t at the scale needed to change the environment and social impacts of the overall Canadian oil sands resource.

Sector leaders began a powerful conversation that ultimately expanded to include chief executives. Their question: what would be required to develop the Canadian oil sands sustainably?

They concluded that incremental changes weren’t enough. Could collaboration and innovation accelerate environmental improvement?

A core decision was that the whole industry had to improve together: one green company was insufficient. As company leaders, we realized that, now that the intensely competitive process of acquiring mineral rights had largely concluded, our destinies were tied together because the oil sands industry has regional, cumulative environmental and social impacts.

Developing Our Collaborative Model

Once we committed to working together, we needed to identify an approach that would let us address our combined impacts.

Design criteria began to emerge. As an industry, we needed to:

Launching COSIA

Oil sands CEOs sanctioned a vision and effort to design a new model. The 13 CEOs involved represent 95% of current oil sands production. A Charter, signed in March 2012, documented the ambitions and commitments required for the journey.

For the first time at a global level, our companies agree to share intellectual property (IP) and technologies: initially related to water and then extending to other environmental priority areas: tailings, greenhouse gases and lands.

When we first asked our lawyers if such sharing were possible, we were told: "No, never.” When we pressed the lawyers on time frame, they said it would take more than two years to accomplish. But through intensive effort, we completed the first agreement, on water, only three months after the Charter signing.

Goals Reached?

Today, COSIA members have shared more than $900 million in intellectual property, with approximately 560 IP contributions in the four environmental priority areas. These accomplishments far exceeded our expectations.

Our success comes partly from the concept of “Equitable Contributions,” which is built into our agreements. We track the dollars, time and IP contributed by each company and review these figures annually with the CEOs. Firms that don’t contribute IP must provide a cash contribution. A third party validates IP relevance and costs of development. The wisdom from all previous efforts has been fully incorporated into the design.

COSIA will be successful when we have quantifiable, measurable goals for each environmental priority area, and drive to achieve these outcomes through project portfolios and third party capabilities. I forsee both continuous improvement through sharing of best practices and game changing opportunities provide additional acceleration.

Collaboration for Innovation

From adversity and opportunity comes innovation. Our key insight is that collaboration requires a common vision and definition of what success looks like: in other words, "joint effort towards common goals." It is a much higher bar than cooperation, which I think of as "pursuit of individual interests jointly." Cooperation was the dominant model of the industry historically.

COSIA is a globally significant model of collaboration whose learnings will inform many other models going forward. Other sectors may not replicate COSIA directly. COSIA is an unusual enterprise: 13 companies, many of whom are among the largest on the planet, tied together by common regional environmental and social interests.

But the notion that the Canadian oil sands, subject to dramatic negative campaigning efforts, can be the genesis of new possibilities for collaboration is both ironic and inspiring. Our experience is worth exploring for others grappling with big sustainability challenges.

About the Author

Gordon Lambert is Executive Advisor, Sustainability and Innovation for Suncor Energy. In this role, Gord works with the CEO, Board, Executive Team, with industry peers and other stakeholders to drive improvements in environmental, social and economic performance through innovation and collaboration. He is currently Suncor’s Shareholder Steering Committee representative on Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance (COSIA).

He is involved with the World Business Council for Sustainable Development in support of its work on climate change, energy and sustainable development within the business community. He is currently on the Boards of the Suncor Energy Foundation, Learning for a Sustainable Future, the Canadian Water Network, is Chair of the Board of Carbon Management Canada and Chairs the Advisory Board of the Network for Business Sustainability.

Additional Resources

NBS Thought Leaders are leading academics and practitioners: world experts on sustainability issues. 

Related Resources

Reports and Articles

Companies produced an estimated 2.7 billion meters of denim in 2016. But those chic distressed or skinny jeans can leave a toxic trail.

NBS
Thought Leaders

Peter Senge, author of The Fifth Discipline, describes why collaboration is essential for our most important issues and how to do it effectively.

Peter Senge
Executive Report

Collaborations can be tense and complex. This tool responds to the question: How can managers improve competitor collaboration to advance sustainability.

NBS